This married dude just harassing co-workers left and right. How gross.
Not inviting women partners to events. WTF?
Who are these guys? Is this 2015?
This guys webpage is almost a bigger crime than his alleged sexual misbehavior: http://www.ajitnazre.com/
I am little surprised that a VC is not firing people for doing this. Just strikes me as a huge liability and a great way to drive talent out of the shop.
Additionally Nazre has a history of sexually harassing female coworkers so at this point it's looking pretty cut and dry.
This dude really likes his name.
then dating the guy after he claims his marriage fell apart.... how dumb is that?
i'm not going to defend his behaviour or any of the other clearly bullshit sexism here, but in the case of this guy misbehaving it is in a very large part enabled by women in a combination of not standing up for themselves and sleeping with a jerk.
you can't just ask everyone around you to stop this stuff if you are actively encouraging it yourself. it has to work both ways.
if he had no success he would learn from the constant rejection. a big problem is that for men, acceptance is so rare that one instance of sex is enough to validate the entire path that lead to it. so they will continue the same behaviour if it leads to any success whatsoever...
(i'm being serious. i can't learn without feedback, and clearly i am wrong, i just have no idea why)
>>in the case of this guy misbehaving it is in a very large part enabled by women in a combination of not standing up for themselves and sleeping with a jerk. you can't just ask everyone around you to stop this stuff if you are actively encouraging it yourself. it has to work both ways.
Hindsight is often blinding. It's easy to read this article and say that if Pao had simply chosen not to date him then none of this would've happened. I think that criticism lacks perspective. Should she have chosen to work at a different firm? That would also have avoided this situation.
People's decisions are based on the information available to them at the time, including both their assumptions about the world and their past experiences. If their assumptions turn out to be wrong[0] or they lack a previous negative experience[1] to inform them they may well make a decision that others later point at and say was ill-advised. It's crucial to understand that even if the decision was a poor one, more often than not the person had no way of knowing that at the time.
[0] For instance, "partners at Kleiner-Perkins will act professionally in the workplace, regardless of personal misgivings"
[1] One which Pao has now gained w.r.t. office romances.
> clearly i am wrong, i just have no idea why
This is the line that prompted me to respond to your post. I disagree with you, and I have explained why above. I do not like this attitude, though - just because others disagree with you does not mean you are wrong. It is important not to discount your own opinion, especially on the Internet. Read what others have said in this thread, think critically about their views as well as your own and see where you end up.
Or he would have not taken no for an answer and kept trying.That last is strongly suggested by the fact that he came on to her, got told "no, you are married", made up this whole elaborate lie of a separation, got told "no, you should reconcile", and then kept the lie rolling long enough that Ms Pao figured he was separated for real. This guy is as persistent as Pepe le Pew.
thanks for the honest reply. you offer a reasonable assessment, as much as i disagree that victim blaming is universally wrong.
this man is responsible for his own actions, and that the bulk of the accusations here are serious regardless as to that behaviour.
however, i think its damaging to the cause of preventing sexual harassment in the workplace if women do not consistently treat all men as equal in this regard - regardless as to how attractive they find them at the time (and e.g. coupled with how married they are)... it seems to me that it makes it impossible to set objective standards.
https://www.linkedin.com/pub/aniruddha-%22ajit%22-nazre/1/23...
or this
http://www.wellington-partners.com/wp/ajit_nazre.html
Same person right?
This married dude just harassing co-workers left and right.
How gross.
Workplace affairs aside, what is the indubitable proof to suggest that these things transpired owing to malice, on his part?
Has he testified, yet?
This reminds me of the Michael Arrington case [1], of people rushing to judgments.
[1]
http://uncrunched.com/2013/04/11/jennifer-allen-false-defama...