That seems more desirable. I tried hired.com on a whim but most of the jobs were the kind I would only accept if I were desperate. Then again, I have a lot of flexibility in my current role and would only leave for a job that fits very specific criteria, so maybe it just wasn't for me.

I once had an internship in college where I worked with Sitecore (a .net cms). When I was applying for jobs out of college, I mentioned it in my resume when I posted it to Monster.com.

It has been many years since I took that resume down, and that technology has been off my resume just as long. However, I still get recruiter spam asking if I’m interested in a 6-month contract-to-hire position on the wrong coast working with Sitecore.

This tool sounds like it fits a pretty good passive use case, but I just thought I should point out why I, particularly, love the limited-time model of Hired.com. It lets me avoid being considered “on the market” for all eternity.