In short this article looks at aspects of programming and says if you're bad at each aspect you're probably bad at the sum of them. I'm not sure what the purpose is... you can figure out more directly whether you're a bad programmer by comparing the code you produce to that of your peers.

Aside from that the made up terms are annoying. It would be more readable if he used

  voodoo code => dead code
  bulldozer code => high cohesion subroutines  
  pinball programming => unreliable code

I can't think of anything good to say about this article.