Hacker News Reader

Hacker News

Comment by bcl | Hacker News Reader

Full thread

bcl

I don't see anything here that you can't do with git alias, what am I missing?

View on HN

well, if you've always wanted to lose the ability to work with branches you're in luck

Branches are a planned feature, check the TODO.

If you would like to contribute to the addition of branches, that would be great. :)

You can easily bash add autocompletion to bash aliases, if you meant that.

For instance, this is my git dotfile doing that to display branches for a cherry-pick alias:

https://github.com/jakub-g/dotfiles/blob/master/git.profile#...

(_gitbranches() is defined at the beginning)

There's more to the package than just aliases.

For example, the gg s command presents you with an easy to look at a quick glance status of your repository. In addition, there are aesthetic changes that increase the intuitiveness of Git itself.

Here's a screenshot of the gg s command in action: http://i.imgur.com/qXSPuv4.jpg.

Sure it's not exactly an alias, but this is basically just splitting the usual `git status` output and coloring it. I have similar functions in my .bash_profile for git and it doesn't require node. Consider this: I can easily scp my dotfiles to a server and use all my shortcuts. To use this I have to install Node, npm, and this package to gain a couple of new shortcuts that make existing functions a little prettier.

Your .bash_profile functions probably aren't exposed to others via a package manager. They're probably not available in a repo for others to contribute to either.

Yes, node/npm are required, but most of the servers I work with these days already have those for other tools.

Mine are, but that’s because I’ve published my .dotfiles for everyone to use. What I haven’t done is made them usable by anyone who isn’t using my dotfiles. That wouldn’t be that hard to do, I just need time to develop infrastructure around it (which is probably worth doing anyway because my dotfiles are feeling a bit creaky).

EDIT: Scratch that. I just saw that git-config supports include directives. The infrastructure is already done for me. Now I just need to separate that bit of code out of the main dotfile repository.

Pairing git-config's include directives with a separate semver-tagged repo for your Git code sounds reasonable.

I guess what I was getting at here is that I haven't come across a good analog to npm for shell scripts or dotfiles "modules". Using node/ruby/py/etc instead of shell scripts is often overkill (debatable for gitgoodies), but having the standardized infrastructure is valuable.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com