Psychedelics not linked to mental health problems or suicidal behavior
jop.sagepub.com
jop.sagepub.com
Yet: "Psychedelic users were more likely than non-users to report a depressive episode before age 18."
Taken together, these are curious findings, because they're deliberately ignoring something that turned out to be a clear correlation, even one that might be the result of a causality in the reverse direction to one that might be otherwise presumed.
"People who choose to use psychedelics might have better initial mental health before using psychedelics, and people who experience problems apparently related to psychedelics may choose to not use them again."
Psych ward patients who got there via psychedelics wouldn't be included in the study also.
What is written in their abstract seems irresponsible in the extreme, given the above limitations:
"We failed to find evidence that psychedelic use is an independent risk factor for mental health problems. Psychedelics are not known to harm the brain or other body organs or to cause addiction or compulsive use; serious adverse events involving psychedelics are extremely rare. Overall, it is difficult to see how prohibition of psychedelics can be justified as a public health measure. "
I'm curious as to what the effect of frequent micro-dosing is...
Why? There is nothing in the report to support that viewpoint, and quite a few points that contradict it to some extent.
Even spacing the doses out to 'multiple times per week' results in rapidly diminishing returns.
I don't personally know of anyone who's life has become messed up because of the types of experiences described above. Some have gone on to 'settle down', have kids, etc. many of us had full time jobs and still do, or finished degrees.
Amphetamine and MDMA, on the other hand, can rapidly turn peoples lives upside down, all the while they think they're being rational people.
Would it be a good idea for everyone to start taking psychedelics? I'm not convinced that's an experiment I want anything to do with, I'm not sure it would scale well. Having said that, alcohol causes, or is a factor in, so much mayhem...
> we found no significant associations between lifetime use of psychedelics...
does lifetime use mean ongoing or once off?
This is pretty typical use of the term. They also distinguished it from "past year use" for LSD.
i know people who took many times longer to recover. the report seems to imply that my experience is just a coincidence. i doubt i would have developed the mental health problems without psychedelics.
the report looks at lifetime use but past year mental health problems, which means you can't say "Psychedelics not linked to mental health problems or suicidal behavior" you have to qualify it by saying "past year".