I disagree with this assertion that I belong to an oppressive majority, or that the majority is oppressive.
>Sure it's inconvenient, but politeness doesn't cost much effort. Eggshells is a good way of putting it.
Tolerance goes both ways. Why should 100 people modify their behaviour so that 1 person doesn't get offended, when 1 person could modify simply raise their threshold for offence, and save a 100 people a lot of hassle.
>If you or anyone you see steps over the line
There is no way to know what or where the line is. The line is totally subjective and unique to each individual. So it would simply be easier and less risky (remaining employed wise) to avoid interacting with the person than spend the time to learn how to avoid triggering their offence reaction. I guarantee the path of least resistance is the one that will be followed.