It's not the be-all and end-all of space stations, but it's better than something that was built decades ago for a previous generation of vehicle.
The most important aspect of the new launch site is that it is simply another site they can launch from. SpaceX has the rockets, they just need a couple weeks between launches at the moment to get the launch pad squared away and prepped for the next launch. By adding a second site[1], they have double their throughput.
[1] Technically it's the third site, but Vandy is limited in what it can launch, as you can only launch into very high inclination orbits from there.
The one part of that speculation that is sourced -- different range safety systems once the rocket is in flight -- does deal with facilities that SpaceX shares with the Air Force and other launch systems (ULA Atlas launches at both sites, at least). But handling of the rockets on the ground is already completely under SpaceX control, and done entirely with their own purpose-built equipment.
[+] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Traffic_in_Arms_R...
People transport extremely fragile things by sea all the time. You may have to be mindful of weather, but it is do-able with the will and money.
Empty pop cans? Several stories tall?
Any rate at all is higher than is tolerable for rockets costing many orders of magnitude more.
REALLY?!?!
Your pop can is not filled up with tons of explosive materials and didn't cost millions of dollars.
The worse thing that can happen if your pop can is damaged is you get a flat soda or a leaky can.
They'll still be near sea-water in Texas of course, but perhaps the wind tends to blow west to east, with the jetstream? I'm not sure.