I'm glad to see this thread, because there seem to be some bugs I need to address.
Any other features you guys would find helpful? Feel free to tell me here or on twitter: @_devbryce
I'm glad to see this thread, because there seem to be some bugs I need to address.
Any other features you guys would find helpful? Feel free to tell me here or on twitter: @_devbryce
Then ask whether you really require cookies. What value do they add?
The page fails to work if cookies are disabled. That is a fact. Some people - a minority, perhaps - disable cookies and other technologies, often for privacy reasons. That is also a fact.
(We could discuss the ins and outs of that discussion, the value proposition, the efficacy, etc., but none of those change those two simple facts.)
Another fact: Sites that use cookies must announce this use in certain jurisdictions. Again we could discuss the merits of this requirement, but that would not change the fact of it.
So were the downvotes for stating facts or for questioning a design decision?
I would have thought HN folks were rather keen on both facts and design discussions.
Perhaps I'm wrong. I'm definitely surprised. Ah well.
Am I missing something, or is there an error/omission in the instructions?
Chrome 41.0.2272.76 m
So in this case the width for "2" would be: 2 * (available_width / (1 * other_items + 2))