Hilarious when people still write articles declaiming postmodernism when it has been dead in continental philosophy for at least 15 years.
Even if you know nothing about art, you only have to look at Wikipedia to find out more about postmodern art and how it differs from modernism.
Oh well...
Because else what would it be? Have we got anything after postmodernism?
This is what makes article hilarious. It is a post-modern piece bashing what it claims to be postmodernism.
UPD: In that respect, saying "I don't like postmodernism" looks as "I don't like air" That's what you've got. For today.
No. Well, you can, but its equivocation: its certainly something that arises in the period after the height of the movement called "modernism", hence, it is "post-modern" in that sense, but its not part of the particular movement which has been labelled "post-modernism".
> Because else what would it be? Have we got anything after postmodernism?
Yes, in both art and philosophy, there are a number of contemporary movements that are active, many of which postdate postmodernism in their origins.
The thing is: we haven't got anything that is not post-modern. Postmodernism is about going in circles in my opinion, and that's what we do. Can't break out.
No doubt the author would respond to criticism by saying they were only trying to start a conversation. In other words: trolling.