China drops leading technology brands for state purchases
reuters.com
reuters.com
There's a lot of this government and intelligence pressure on infrastructure providers going on. The general public is not informed. The situation appears to be global.
Our secret intelligence culture and process is antithetical to democracy, and enabling of plutocracy, neo-fascism, and the total corruption of our government. - Robert David Steele, ex-Marine, ex-CIA, Open Source Intelligence Expert, 'The Open-source Everything Manifesto'
A lot of the US capacity to break in to networks seems to come from just being aggressive paying individual hackers to sell them exploits out of public view. Some of these people have said to me 'I know it's unethical, but it's what I enjoy and I'm good at - the only other market is organized crime'. It's a constant digital arms race where the public loses. Hopefully the governments of the world will realize the futility here and begin to redirect resources toward open source systems.
Cisco went a few rounds with them in the past, accusing and suing Huawei for essentially reverse engineering their products.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/07/29/cisco_huawei_case_en...
Based on my experience, the Chinese now have the breadth, depth, confidence, and money to develop complex software on their own, so I expect to see less of this in the future.
As per this article, the Chinese can make a fair point to the US government that so long as Huawei is barred from the US, then there's nothing to discuss about telecom infrastructure equipment.
But I hope and wish the US and other Western governments will press for more media openness in China with the goal of ultimately getting China to tear down their system of censorship and the Great Firewall. Because, ultimately, I believe it hurts modern China more than it helps.
I think some things China are doing some things that is worth a WTO investigation. For example that you cannot put up IT with media services in China without a local partner and a license from the Chinese state. Then surprise the local China partner may end up copying your services intellectual property. However Chinese companies are free to put up business in the West without local partners. That is unfair competition!
Either way, pressure on US companies to not blindly fall in step behind the US government is a good thing.
It's basically the same argument civil liberties activists have for when a "freedom" country like US starts torturing people or censoring information. Doing that gives other much worse states the excuse to do it freely as well. If US then comes out and says "hey, you're such an awful government for torturing your people and whatnot", they will respond: "oh yeah? Right back at ya, buddy! Now will you get off your high horse?!"
http://www.ibtimes.com/china-us-senate-torture-report-americ...
That said, NSA spying is very much a national security issue. Why would you allow other countries to spy on you, hack you, and steal your secrets? I think it's natural to want to take any actions you can against that. It's actually disappointing that only "rival" countries such as China and Russia are taking measures against it. All the European countries should be doing it as well, especially since US doesn't seem to make any difference between China or say Germany.
Better yet skilled foreign hackers won't be checking the security of these products since they most likely can't get their hands on them.
So it's security through obscurity for the most part.
I don't think Germany or any other E.U. countries will follow.
Neither Germany nor Europe as a whole makes enough electronics equipment to replace everything that may have been rigged by the NSA or other nations' spy agencies. The NSA does not restrict itself to equipment clearly marked as "made in USA" either.
We cannot solve this problem by rolling back globalisation and division of labor, aiming for national self-sufficiency.
That does not imply rolling back globalisation or division of labor nor is it aiming at national self-sufficiency, it's about competition and having choices.
It's virtually impossible to evade US-american or chinese products if you want to buy a modern electronic consumer device. That is what should change in my opinion.
The choice that I would like to have is a radically more transparent, pluralistic design, development and production process. We need many eyes from all kinds of different people on every single piece of hardware and software. We won't get that by having one government take action against another one. This needs to be a global initiative.
Macs are not an option, and I really doubt 40-50% of Chinese users would start using Linux.
And it would be great if one could buy insurance to that effect on equipment and software.
The NSA has done great economic damage to US exports of software and IT equipment. I suppose that US government oversight of the NSA takes that into account.
That's just not possible. Devices are way too complex nowadays. Too much can be hidden.
A product will have multiple ASICs, SOCs, etc. Those in themselves are too complex for any single individual to really understand them. How much effort could an independent lab put into certifying them? It would literally take man-years.
How do you certify an SOC? Start with a gate level Verilog netlist? Good luck figuring out anything useful from that. You think a vendor will give an outside lab a higher level Verilog RTL to review for a design? Not likely. That's highly valuable intellectual property.
About all that could be done is monitoring the software or equipment to see if there is any unexpected network activity flowing in or out. That in itself would be a difficult thing to to.
I agree, but where would you put it such that the intelligence services of the Big-8 couldn't co-opt it? They don't always go to the owners and say "Hey, yo, mind if we put our spy stuff in your stuff?"