Or is it hipper, more fashinable to add an "a" at the ends of words? Is a hipsterista cooler than a run of the mill hipster?
Or is it hipper, more fashinable to add an "a" at the ends of words? Is a hipsterista cooler than a run of the mill hipster?
Most supporters of Snowden, as well as he, present him as a patriot, a defender of the constitution in the face of a spying apparatus which has lost its way. So I would think the last thing they'd want to do is present him and his associations as militant leftists. Therefore, if the assertion to add "a" is a kind of nod to leftist activism, that would seem to betray Snowden's expressed intent.
For example, the Sandinistas would likely see themselves as fighting Yankee imperialism and domestic supporters of the Sandinistas might have an angle of opposing CIA activity. Especially if you bring Assange into this, you really are at most a few hops of association away from the literal Sandinistas.
Fitting the "Patriot / Constitution" image in there is a little awkward because of how those words have been appropriated by the far right wing, invoking patriotism is also a little awkward with respect to how much patronage from Russia et al. is involved here.
I don't really care what the word ends up being but it would be convenient to have a compact word like "Snowdenista" and I'd appreciate it if the term isn't something pompous and not really indicative like "Patriotic Constitution-Supporter"
In my mind, the only viable defense for Snowden is a constitutional defense, else, it would enter treacherous territory, ie. he'd not then be defending citizen's rights, etc. but rather be exposing state secrets, as it were.
I'm a patriot because I love my country. I'm not a nationalist because I love my son.
(Mr. Bane can verify that they were very yummy indeed! ;)