In mathematics and logic the "rules" are not only known but defined a priori by a human being. Not so with physics, and as a result the "proofs" of physics, what are known as scientific theories, have never been absolute. Quantum Mechanics merely elaborated on that theme.
Dealing with randomness has always been a part of science. Understanding how far that randomness permeated the nature of the universe was a revelation, but it's hyperbolic and sensationalistic to say it as you did.
Would "the definition of science" suddenly not be destroyed... or would it be re-destroyed?
Second of all, you missed the point of this sub-thread. Even one of the quoted scientists claims, "Bell's theorem is the most profound discovery of science."
He didn't say it "destroyed science".
How does the theory of the randomness described in QMT destroy science?