Human DNA enlarges mouse brains
news.sciencemag.org
news.sciencemag.org
Of course, human intelligence is hard to pin down -- for my personal definition, it is the ability to specifically communicate new ideas to other members (i.e., not other members just picking up a skill from observation only, but for one to be a teacher), and to be able to (as a group) remember and pass down history. Oh, and the ability to develop a space program.
How likely is that there will be a sophisticated tool using civilization is a more interesting question. There are non human species that use tools[0], but they lack in sophistication. In order to start advanced technological civilization I think there are few conditions: ability to store information, ability to communicate information, and ability to utilize and improve tools.
[0] Some primates use sharp sticks as weapons.
Well, less than impossibly hard. Here's an interesting spin on this argument: http://diyhpl.us/~bryan/papers2/ai/How%20hard%20is%20artific...
On a related note: http://fennetic.net/irc/human_chimpanzee_brain_differences.p...
And also, this was an interesting exploration of the topic, with in utero electroporation of cortical matter to induce more brain growth: http://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11034136.pdf
> Of course, human intelligence is hard to pin down -- for my personal definition
I suggest giving up on that question. Even if humans are not intelligent, there's at least one or a few properties of human brain matter that are causing all of these unexpected and unexplained results we observe from its operation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimpanzee%E2%80%93human_last_...
Of course I wouldn't bet too much, because it's really a bet on many, many events occurring together, and we're all familiar with the product law.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_evolution
If we started a human-directed breeding program to develop chimps capable of language (arbitrarily chosen marker of intelligence) right now, I would guess we might be able to cut that time down to merely hundreds of thousands of years.
Another option is to pick a collection of human genes that seem like they may be relevant, and just insert them into chimp genomes. Followed by something like your selective breeding program. I would be fairly surprised if it still takes 100k years.
Hey, that would be cheating!
http://news.sciencemag.org/evolution/2012/10/raw-food-not-en...
Also, a bonobo has been trained in the use of fire.
That cartoon feels like it was from so long ago... Does getting this reference make any of you that also happened to watch during its original airing feel old?
"Pinky: Gee, Brain, what do you want to do tonight? Brain: The same thing we do every night, Pinky - try to take over the world"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_mPrhwpZ-8
Pinky and Brain are genetically enhanced laboratory mice. In each episode, Brain devises a new plan to take over the world which ultimately ends in failure
A better picture:
http://today.duke.edu/2015/02/bigbrain
So a mouse injected with chimp DNA seems thinking about bananas and party in the beach and a mouse injected with a similar gen in the homer DNA looks pensative... interesting