Comment by bendtheblock | Hacker News Reader

Comment by bendtheblock | Hacker News Reader

This just shows how out of touch the UK govt is. I wonder which Labour sponser lobbied for this. The government assume this is a hardcore minority. I'm not an illegal filesharer, but I sure know a lot people that do. I don't think it's a small minority. Questions...

- How do you define 'illegal fileshare'? Based on the network used? The content of the file?

- How would this be implemented? Would the ISP do the blocking?

- What's to stop the 'criminal' from using a wifi connection elsewhere?

- What effect does this have on the neutrality of the net in the UK?

(Sorry, posted this comment on another thread before seeing this)

Also:

- Does the whole household get cut off when one member illegally fileshares?

"Does the whole household get cut off when one member illegally fileshares?"

I would imagine the entire connection gets cut-off, because it would be very difficult to allow the household to keep the connection and prevent one person from going online.

What if they move house? what if its a big house? or several flats? an internet cafe? a business? a university?

I can see three plausible options:

  i) The government throws its hands in the air and gives up.
  ii) The government cuts off the entire building/complex.
  iii) The government cuts off people entirely at random.

Knowing the way most governments tend to work, my money is on number 3, with number 2 coming in a distant second.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com