Crunchbang is not dead
crunchbangplusplus.org
crunchbangplusplus.org
Continuing with Crunchbang just seems like a lot of wasted effort to me. The effort could be better spent working within the Debian project itself.
That said I'm using XFCE at the moment because it "just works" and it's doubtful it will ever require any amount of time or energy. I chose it over Openbox/Crunchbang specifically because I wanted something I didn't have to think about.
> Philip has mentioned that, since CrunchBang has been his project from the beginning, he would like to see the name separated from any derivative that succeeds it.
Not sure if the people responsible for this fork are aware
[1]: https://twitter.com/corenominal/status/566945562512347136
Edit: It seems #!++ is a successor to #!, likely by a different maintainer. The OP mentions differences include a new theme and being based on debian jessie, whereas the last #! was based on wheezy.
#!++, A CrunchBang revival project.
Philip Newborough -- Corenominal -- has officially discontinued his efforts with the fast and light distro. While Philip believes that the project no longer serves the Linux space in the way he had originally intended, we believe that #! still has great potential and serves the Linux community as the perfect combination of elegance and efficiency.
So far, we're still only just finishing our 'Jessie-proofing' of the #! metapackage. While we intend to keep the distro very much the same as it has been over the years, some changes must be made to adapt to newer dependencies. Most notably, #!++ will have a new gtk theme (by xoraxiom) and a new default iconset using the faenza-crunchbang-icon-theme package from the #! repo.
A few more changes have been made under the hood, but stay tuned to our website at crunchbangplusplus.org for further updates. We look forward to bringing further fixes and enhancements to the project and documenting our methods and progress along the way.
Lastly, we'd like to thank Philip for all his hard work through the years, the legacy he's created, and the bar he's set for sleek high-performance distros.
Which somehow the various stories here are failing to elucidate.
Which gives me yet another opportunity to trot out one of my most popular HN comments of all time: "Please Forward to Marketing":
https://www.reddit.com/r/dredmorbius/comments/27d5xr/please_...
Tell me what your product is. What it does, where it works, how it does it, what it requires. Is it a physical product (or is it shipped in one), an interactive application, a Web service, a programming language / tool? As a reader notes, don't make me use Wikipedia to figure out WTF your company does.
(Originally on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7489870)
Since Crunchbang uses the Debian repos, can I somehow get onto a Debian/Openbox etc. direction without a reinstall?
and Thank-you #! Great project xx
Check your sources list (either /etc/apt/sources.list or a set of files in /etc/apt/sources.list.d). Are you pulling in packages from Debian repositories already? If I remember correctly #! had its own repo which contained its WM configuration and whatnot but the rest was stock Debian. If so, there's probably no action required.
If not, I would wait and see what some more experienced #! users are doing with repository migration. The Crunchbang forums are probably a good starting point.
Do a ubuntu minimal install and install openbox. In one fell swoop you've created something at least as good as crunchbang! Holy fuck!
I can understand why the l33t skiddie does it; they're anal about spending hours making their desktops shiny and tricked out with chinese cartoon backgrounds. I just expect a little more... productivity from hn.
These days, I just use virtual machines when I need Linux, but I'd switch back to Crunchbang if multi monitor (one output from motherboard, one from gpu) worked better.
I did the same thing with Arch, as well as with Void Linux. Void, in particular, is a distro I find very interesting and would like to use, but the hours I would spend making a usable desktop for myself (assuming I would even succeed, and prior experience has shown that not to be the case) are better spent elsewhere.
> Do a ubuntu minimal install and install openbox. In one fell swoop you've created something at least as good as crunchbang!
That's how I know you've never actually used Crunchbang; it's a lot more than "Debian with Openbox". Corenominal's scripts, layout, app choices, tweaks, and other modifications are more than enough for it to qualify as a standalone Debian-based distro, rather than "Debian with Openbox".
> I just expect a little more... productivity from hn.
Productivity is exactly why I like Crunchbang. Instead of spending those hours upon hours tweaking vanilla Debian, I can dive in and focus on real work, letting the OS fade into the background.
The CrunchBang maintainer's reasons for discontinuing the distro are spot on. It's absurd to fork the entire distro, adding a delay on package updates from the upstream distro just for the sake of defining a default set of packages.
Create a complementary apt repo for any packages you need that aren't available upstream (CrunchBang has very few of these), and perhaps spin an installer image that installs Debian with your preferred default package set, but for the love of god, stop adding lag to the process by which your users receive security updates and bugfixes from upstream.