Undercover restorers fix Paris landmark's clock (2007)
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
Couldn't really find an article with a good overview in english but heres a video with subtitles and an interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xr3GV2ZLHDI http://www.megawordsmagazine.com/interviewDetail.php?intervi...
More pictures, including the clock mechanism and the work lounge they made - http://urban-resources.net/untergunther.html
http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/were-not-vandals-nylex-clo...
It's available here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5OiL8oVj0sA (~45 minutes)
Basically: did people (the judge specifically) make the Right Decision here, or was there simply some legal shenanigans that allowed the restorers to go free?
Basically, it's not illegal (nor authorized) to enter a monument after opening hours. Nor is it restore an antique clock.
The charge eventually used against Untergunther was one of damaging a door, but it seems it was picked clean and completely undamaged. Interestingly the accused where so sure of being in the right that they didn't bother with a lawyer. There may have been a lot of goodwill toward them as they were possibly guilty of more serious crimes, with decent evidence against them. Basically it looks like pretty much everyone saw it as technically illegal but not morally wrong, and completely victimless.
What I found to be the most complete article : http://www.lemonde.fr/societe/article/2007/11/24/aux-intrus-...
The people in charge of the place neither fixed the clock nor kept the place safe, so they do indeed look slightly incompetent.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecce_Homo_%28El%C3%ADas_Garc%C...