Microsoft Wants To Buy Love In Silicon Valley
techcrunch.com
techcrunch.com
Personally, I don't think that money buys love. It gets us attention, but I believe that we'll only win people over by providing an awesome cloud solution. Furthermore, I'm hoping that doing so much of our development out in the open on Github allows devs to see what we're doing, that we care about it being awesome, and that we're not afraid to sit down and quickly put out a repo with code if we run into a company that needs something.
If anybody has questions, I'm happy to answer them.
http://visualstudio.uservoice.com/forums/121579-visual-studi...
Also C# on XBox One had been promised like a year ago but nothing happened:
http://visualstudio.uservoice.com/forums/121579-visual-studi...
What is the point of User Voice then?
It is honestly, in my opinion, Azure's current biggest failing. We use cutting edge features and marketplace offerings when we can and the space seems ripe for disruption with companies like Birst, Spotfire, and others really going on the offensive. Microsoft has one of the most mature Data Warehousing offerings for the traditional environment, and it seems crazy that after 5 years there's nothing built into Azure for it.
All that said, do you know of any plans, timelines, or similar services to a fully hosted SSAS-like Data Warehousing solution?
AWS does offer some very special purpose data stores like DynamoDB and SimpleDB but I have not used them much.
Google has BigQuery and AWS has Redshift.
https://github.com/wal-e/wal-e
Also: Azure SQL is $15/month and includes restoration of the database to any point in time in the last 14 days. I LOVE Postgres but finally gave into this value proposition.
It is a lot more restrictive and thus many tools (such as your own SQL Management Studio) do not work well with it.
Is there any plan to make these two siblings more compatible with eachother?
Furthermore, Azure SQL is very unclear about its performance guarantees. Your DTU's have no mapping to anything in the real world which we can compare. Are there any plans of addressing that?
I tried to get an Azure WebSites with an Azure SQL instance of Wordpress working. Getting PHP to run on Azure WebSites was easy/pleasant, getting Azure SQL to talk to PHP was an absolute nightmare and then even once that is done you have issues with instance naming and paths.
To be honest I completely gave up. I spent three days on the above setup, and never did get Wordpress working. Then after I gave up I spent one afternoon setting up the same thing using an Azure VM.
I like the concept of Azure Websites, but Azure SQL is just "meh." It isn't compatible with MS SQL which is a big problem frankly. A lot of stuff supports MS SQL out of the box, but it seems like Azure SQL is something else entirely.
PS - Azure does have an MySQL compatible offering, but it is by a third party. Nothing by MS themselves. So the pricing model is awkward.
But I just can't do it without real POSIX support.
I'm just invested in a POSIX world. I want native BASH, fork, a git that isn't 5x slower (last I tried), and a real terminal.
So, Microsoft... if you're reading this, can you please, pretty please, add a nice officially supported not-going-anywhere POSIX layer to your OS? It's the reason I switched to OS X, and it would be the reason I'd switch back to MS.
It's almost the only thing you're missing from my side of the developer culture.
Alternatively, I'd be happy if .NET were truly cross-platform, so I could use my Mac to develop apps for the Windows Phone I'm typing this from (without a VM).
You can also SSH into a Windows box with powershell server, it's expensive though. If Microsoft just purchased it and made it an add on, I suspect a lot of Unix people would be pleasantly surprised by how rad powershell is.
Upon hearing the word "server" one kid next to me enthusiastically shouted, "Use Azure! It's easy and I'll help you set it up right now". Nothing beats a testimonial from a peer.
Now, if only I could use Linux commands on the Windows terminal...