> Our terms of service which all these users agreed to prohibits this explicitly – You may not access the Services if You are Our direct competitor, except with Our prior written consent.
Is that something that is actually defensible?
Is that something that is actually defensible?
Again, IANAL, but I certainly would not make any decisions on the validity of this without consulting one.
If you mean, "would be defended" or "could know about it", then probably not. It just adds more to the name and shame tactic they decided to do.
Examples that come to mind: prohibit people renting an apartment to have a cat, reduce the time you have to return a product bought online (and get a refund) to less than the legal time, ...