> Coming up with a new "standard", then criticizing the established open-source project for failing to implement it, is a common tactic
> One last fact, which you might find funny: one of these alternative implementations of Docker's image distribution system is developed by CoreOS, the very same vendor which is propping up this so-called standard
> Do you know how many complaints I received, since Docker was created, that I didn't "comply" with this or that self-proclaimed standard? Dozens
> But [CoreOS] never did, because as competing commercial vendors their interest is to weaken and fragment the Docker standard, not contribute to it.
~~
> based off the bad blood developing between CoreOS and Docker
You know, I think this is really 1-way... I have not see anything along these levels of hostility coming from the CoreOS camp.