Unfortunately, this laudable process has been more and more hijacked by special interest groups, to the point where international treaties are used as backdoors to impose legislation that would otherwise be very unpopular at home. An MP voting in, say, New Zealand to extend copyright terms, would get a lot of stick; but now he can say "hey, there is some good with the bad, less barriers are good for the economy blablabla" and vote for the whole bundle with significant political cover; he can then collect his copyright-lobby cheque AND keep his seat, win-win.
In a way, this is natural; this sort of dealmaking was commonplace at local and national level at most times in history, and it took a lot of effort to make it fairly transparent through the democratic process; now it gets done at a global level, where there isn't a democratic process yet -- we don't vote for a "world parliament" where this sort of issues could be thrashed out in public, we rely on ambassadors and special envoys with wide negotiating powers and no accountability, which naturally results in corruption.
Add to that the indirect benefits that the movie industry brings to the tourism industry (yep, they measured it), and you have an agreement that is beneficial to the top two industries.
New Zealand wants to sell Americans milk and lamb. Then they're going to want to come over and teach Americans how to grow your _own_ milk and lamb.
Due to reasons US Congress can vote only binary on approving the agreement. Take it as is or throw it all away. In other places it is similar. So there are internal politics to consider.