Nokia sues Apple for infringement of multiple patents
nokia.com
nokia.com
Of course, they still have no device on the market that does what our devices could do, and probably never will. I hope Bilski changes some of the patent BS for the better.
Nokia have of course every right to enforce their IP, but PR wise they look very lame for this move. The timing (just as Apple announces a record quarter) and the fact they clearly have failed to make a competitive product to the iPhone, just makes them look desperate.
Nokia is too big a player in a small pond.
Dear Nokia,
For more than a decade I've been a loyal user of your products, pretty much every year or so I would upgrade my phone to your latest model.
Today that comes to an end.
My reason is that I think that companies should compete on quality and price, not to use software patents as a means of stifling competition.
Software Patents were a mistake when they were granted to begin with, to see the proud company that Nokia once was stoop to the use of the dirtiest weapons in business is really sad.
I realize that my voice hardly counts in issues like this, but I figured that by letting you know, you are aware that there is another price attached to this lawsuit.
best regards,
Jacques MattheijUnless you don't but Apple either, which makes sense.
So personally, I don't blame companies for patenting. I do blame companies that sue.
But the system needs fixing.
With the rules setup how they currently are, it'd be irresponsible for a company such as Apple not to patent things incase they get sued.
I'd rather see that changed so that no one can get silly all-encompassing general patents, and certainly not software or UI patents.
The ten patents in suit relate to technologies fundamental to making devices which are compatible with one or more of the GSM, UMTS (3G WCDMA) and wireless LAN standards. The patents cover wireless data, speech coding, security and encryption and are infringed by all Apple iPhone models shipped since the iPhone was introduced in 2007.
--
So these are likely to be more hardware related. That doesn't make the claims any more valid, but I don't think that these will have many (any?) software claims.
It is, pardon the pun, patent nonsense.
Have you seen some facts that this would be about software patents? I would guess it is a mixture of hardware and software, from the press release:
"The ten patents in suit relate to technologies fundamental to making devices which are compatible with one or more of the GSM, UMTS (3G WCDMA) and wireless LAN standards. The patents cover wireless data, speech coding, security and encryption..."
Software patents are just a tool to extort, not an incentive to innovate.
This is not like Nokia went and patented something that was already existing in the market and is trolling. They poured their own money into it, so why would they let a competitor, esp. a very succesful competitor use their tech for free???
The patents listed all contain stuff that seems to be pretty obvious when it comes to mobile communications.
Yes, you need encryption, thousands of manyears of work not done at Nokia preceded that. Yes, you will need GSM, which is unfortunately patent encumbered, but since there is no other option that makes any patents on that tech a simple matter of extortion.
WiFi ? How else will you connect to a lan from a mobile phone ?
Etc. If this is Nokias best shot at showing how they're going to 'compete' with Apple then they've just told us they don't think they can. What a total waste of a reputation.
It reminds me of the GIF patent.
I spent 40B euros figuring out how to and and digging a well to get water to my parched village. I add a bucket, but the water is still kind of muddy. I'm the only well, though, so I do well enough.
Then someone comes along and digs a well a couple hundred feet away, adds a pumping system (so they can sell more water) and a filtration system (so the water is cleaner). Nobody wants my water anymore. So I'm about to go broke.
So of course, instead of making a better pumping and filtration system, I sue the guy making the better well. At least, that's Nokia's position.
In your analogy, you seem to be skipping the issue of patents entirely. Note that Apple did not go out and "dig it's own well" by developing something completely unrelated to GSM, UTMS, Wi-Fi, etc. Whether Nokia's claim turns out to be valid aside, it's undeniable that Apple is using the technology that Nokia is making the claim on. That is to say, they aren't suing over Apple developing "the better well", they're suing Apple for using their well without compensation.
The point is that they could not have because that would be inoperable.
I'm sure my one-man-boycott isn't going to impress anybody but that's the sweep your own street argument working for you.
It's a variation on the 'if one percent fallacy', 'if everybody does it then it will make a difference'. And I'm sure that not everybody - or even a small percentage - will do this, after all the only time when it will make Nokia recant is if the loss in sales outweighs their potential gain in this suit.
But that doesn't matter to me. Point of principle. You do software patents, I might buy your stuff. You sue using software patents (and there seems to be some confusion about that, the non-software issues are dead obvious, the software issues should never have been granted or should have become common property the second Nokia started pushing for those things to be accepted as standards).
Nokia was one of the parties pushing hardest to allow software patents in the EU:
Tim Cook, Apple COO, Jan 21 2009.
Screw them and the horse they rode in on, this is just a bid of weakness. If you can't compete with your product line in fair ways then you should revamp your product line, not turn to your lawyers.
What a bunch of losers.
I've been using Nokia phones for the last decade, with a two week 'diversion' to Samsung (talk about bad firmware). Nokia has an 'ok' product but it could be a whole lot better, I'm as loyal as can be but software patents are a bad thing and using them like this is just plain dumb.
Bye Bye Nokia, you once were an outstanding company.
Pretty clear to me. Encoding, data, security and encryption are all software issues, not hardware issues.
What a sad thing for them to resort to.
maemo looked interesting, but even the firmware update method was archaic and extremely over complex. From what I remember it only worked if you unplugged the usb cable and plugged it in at exactly the right point or something! (swear to god, this was in the README).
Maybe it's all changed now though.
I do not know re. if the UI experience has changed. I can see how N-series tablets can appeal to hackers who like to modify the software that is running on their device. From this POV having a full-fledged Linux on a mobile device is a plus. But N710/N800 was indeed less slick in terms of the user experience than Apple's devices.
But that does not give nokia a free pass to do this either.
Such as when?
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090121/1932143481.shtml
However, I'd be surprised if other examples didn't exist.
Note: When I said Apple "played the patent game" I wasn't specifically referring to filed lawsuits. The threat of a lawsuit is often enough.
Only in the sense that an author has to "tread carefully" around ripping off another author's work. Clearly Apple's patents did not prevent the Pre or Android or any number of other devices from making it to market without apparent functional omissions. What exactly is the problem?
The threat of a lawsuit is often enough.
Enough for what? To prevent someone from violating your rights under law? Well, yeah. That's the way a lot of things work. Holding a patent does not strike me as inherently reprehensible.
A separate question is if intellectual property is a good idea at all. But that is beyond the question at hand.
Patent trolls are just a bad idea, but in this case Nokia may have created a foundation that the Apple is building upon. Companies pay for licensing technology all the time. USB, Firewire, Bluetooth, ...
"The patents cover wireless data, speech coding, security and encryption and are infringed by all Apple iPhone models."
I would love to know exactly what they are suing for?
http://www.technewsworld.com/story/67615.html?wlc=1256230659
Google isn't immune either
http://phandroid.com/2009/09/25/cyanogen-gets-cd-from-google...
None of these companies are golden. Buy what works for you.
I dont know if Apple is liable if the infringement is by the modem in the iPhone since Apple doesnt make the modem, they buy it from another company.
So they figure rather than to wait they should sue first, hope to get apples attention in a way they can't ignore and 'settle' for cross licensing. And so the madness continues.
Nokia should give up their software patents and simply make a stand instead of going out of their way to look like losers here.
They were one of the most r&d driven companies in the world after Xerox, the stuff they did was pretty groundbreaking, unfortunately in the field of software that allows you to take out patents. That should have never happened. Nokia was one of the parties lobbying the EU very hard to allow software patents:
http://wiki.openrightsgroup.org/wiki/Software_patents
Now you can see why.
"Nokia has already successfully entered into license agreements including these patents with approximately 40 companies, including virtually all the leading mobile device vendors, allowing the industry to benefit from Nokia's innovation."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/05/apple-sues-woolwort...
What do the say about those who live by the sword?
Nokia is suing Apple because they've been beaten at handsets and are losing money, and someone decided this was their best shot at getting back.
Apple has a long history of heavy handed legal tactics against much weaker entities, including bloggers and critics. Apple innovates. They have a real product, so they often find themselves on this end of the stick when it comes to patents. In other matters however, they seem quite comfortable swing it. Especially at small heads.
I suppose there's no small element of schadenfreude here to see the tables turned and Apple unfairly harassed by a perversion of the law.
From Wikipedia's entry on Australian trademark law: If an application is accepted it will be published for opposition purposes for three months, during which time third parties may oppose registration on certain grounds. If there are no oppositions, or any oppositions are overcome, a certificate of registration will issue. The term of registration in Australia is 10 years