Hacker News Reader

It's clear from the memo that the FCC considers security risks to be exempt from this requirement.

It sounds like the AP being on your network is what constitutes the security risk. I doubt the FCC would have a problem with a network administrator taking action like that. Unrelated APs are different.

View on HN

It's also arguably not "harmful interference"... it's a legitimate operation within your network.

Yeah, big difference between limiting access to your own network and limiting access to someone else's

The link escapes me now but isn't this what Marriott is claiming?

thers a diference between a rogue ap atached to your DS (distribution system) and a rogue client device.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com