Breast-feeding mothers in Europe and US have had their images removed.
EDIT: Not sure if that still happens, but it's easy enough to find articles on WWW about it.
Breast-feeding mothers in Europe and US have had their images removed.
EDIT: Not sure if that still happens, but it's easy enough to find articles on WWW about it.
Several years ago an image of a friend I (re)posted was subject to FB policy-based deletion. I'm not sure whether this was because reposting other people's images was frowned on at that time or the sight of the top of a male ass wearing female underwear poking out from jeans in a group called the "ass appreciation society" was a bit too racy (I can't find the email I received about it, and I believe the original pic is still there) but I'm convinced it was several orders of magnitude less likely to have caused anyone offence than a Muhammed-cartoon-meme.
Should pages that advocate violence be removed? What if it's political, like "Death to Israel"?
http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2014/08/fa...
Or what if it's in line with official US policy? Like "death to ISIS," or "death to Boko Haram."
Who said Facebook's censorship was arbitrary?
Naively, we can now say Facebook views breasts as "offensive" as pictures of Mohammad or decapitation videos.
It's become a bit of a running joke.