The Connection Between Viral Events, Traffic, and Sales
blog.desk.pm
blog.desk.pm
The recent Lockitron discussion was quite damning and negative - I imagine that overwhelmingly negative feedback might have limited any sales from HN readers too. That discussion was here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8953457
I did see that comment but I ignored it, at least in part because it seemed to be sort of templated "hipster dislike" complaints, like about how it's trendy and other people are doing similar things, etc, and not a specific or understandable critique of how the product did/didn't live up to his hopes when purchasing it.
it's fun, rewarding, and i'm learning a ton.
each version will get better and i'm quite thankful it's not a sole echo chamber where i'm justifying my own beliefs with... myself.
:)
As an anecdotal example I used $100 Adwords voucher to drive traffic to my movie torrent meta-search engine https://moviemagnet.net on specific keywords: 'movie torrents', 'torrents', and 'movie downloads'. The most successful visitors by bounce rate and time on the site was for the most focused keyword, 'movie torrents' by a significant margin.
I'd love to see some white papers on the affiliation between sales and focused marketing to tech-savvy consumers, not just casual internet users.
For the record, I never heard of Desk, but now I have. And if I'd seen your earlier blog post I guess I would have too. Now if I am googling for whatever Desk does (I have no idea) and I find a few products among which Desk, then I am much more likely to go "Oh that was this thing on hacker news" and buy that instead of your competitors. Why? Because I know most products on HN are open source products or small startups with hard working people behind it, and that's something I value and trust rather than any random other search result. Not direct sales perhaps, but publicity is worth something too.
But your perspective is a really healthy one. Publicity is good.
The key is to ensure that relevant keywords are part of the anchor text i.e. the "Title" submitted to HN.
If yes, then the title is good.
Also, following the massive influx of visitors on "D-day" a secondary influx of visitors often follows. This is from mentions on twitter/fb/G+.
Combined together thats a LOT of eyeballs. The key is to be relevant when posting content on HN. As long as you share something that people find interesting, everyone wins.
It's a great publicity piece, for sure, but it doesn't always impact the business... which is very clear now in my own experience!
"If I were to connect raw traffic figures with sales
directly it would have equated with something around
~$25,000 in net revenue."
If success was as easy as writing content for HN we could all just skip to being millionaires.Reaching HN is a recipe - write, submit, and master getting 2 or 3 early upvotes. There's no unknown steps, there's no mystery, the best time of day to submit has been documented 100 times along with the words you should use and the topics you should write about.
Reaching your ideal customers is much harder because you don't have meticulous instructions that read "just add labor".
Sure, with a bit of effort and luck you can find yourself being discussed on HN for a day. But your time would be better spend improving the product itself.
Indie dev "business stats" blogging is more about trying to gain recognition, show off a little bit, and validate your part in the perceived community. For a first time indie, I can see how attractive it is to get into the HN glare. But ultimately it's an ego thing. It has little relation to the actual business.
If you do have a blog it should be about something important to the users of the product. Topics relevant to the product itself, and its development. Not the business and the marketing.
All tell you though... it "FELT" like a viral event for me!
http://qz.com/307204/google-admits-that-advertisers-wasted-t...