You talk about hiring "human beings" instead of "robots", but then you deny them the autonomy and freedom to make decisions/risks for themselves. Sure, it's nice to have noble perks being mandated by government and enforced onto (supposedly greedy, and "capitalist") employers. But it also means that you deny individuals who voluntarily choose to make do without those perks, or who do not need them, to lose the privilege of having employers that offer the type of employment they want/need.
>"because in most of the developed world, it's accepted that when you are building a company, you are helping to build a better society"
[Citation Required]
Citation request aside, I thought that it was understood that that's what taxes and the state is for? Whether it achieves that is besides the point. Additionally, I'd argue that the current prevailing opinion of society is that "corporations" and "businesses" are greedy, evil and generally not in it to benefit society. The opposite of what you suggest is the prevailing opinion; perhaps you're projecting your values onto a society whose collective opinion does not agree with you?