That sounds more like a navigation problem than a problem with the code (unless the function names are misleading).
Also, I probably should have been clearer above. Sometimes a short function is the right approach, particularly for something that is going to be done over and over again, but the overall goal is clarity, not short functions.
Anyways, it's not worth getting too hung up on I don't think, it seems my opinion is the minority one.
I've never seen this discussion play out where the "short function" side is saying that the only goal of short functions is...short functions.
Obviously "clarity" vs "short-functions" is a no-brainer discussion. But fails to acknowledge the complexities and nuances being discussed.