“I got an email from Chase saying that all our assets are frozen”
jonstokes.com
jonstokes.com
- All of my assets were not frozen. 99% of our assets are with Barclays, and we just use Chase so that we can have a local checking account. (Barclays doesn't do that in the US.) So everything tied to Chase and our credit cards were frozen because of the tax lien.
- The source of the problem was my former CPA. He just screwed up. He's a nice guy who does a solid business in the decent-sized midwestern city where he's located, but for whatever reason of inattenion and/or lack of good enough training/information, he had me file in the wrong state. He also doesn't have any insurance (not required where he practices), so if MA hadn't been cool about waiving penalties and interest it may not have been possible for me to recover that from him by the time I paid legal fees, etc.
- I got a great MA tax lawyer (Philip S. Olsen, now of Burns and Levinson), and he worked with the Mass. tax authorities to help them understand that I wasn't some seedy tax dodger and that this was the fault of my CPA.
Now, here's what I learned:
- Ask your CPA if he or she has insurance, and for how much. Don't be shy, because this kind of thing could happen to you. And don't think that just because various professionals and bigwigs in town use them, that they're either not going to make a mistake or that they have insurance.
- There is no bank or credit union, no matter how foreign or local, that would not have frozen my assets in response to the merest hint of a request from MA. Every financial institution in the world is going to roll over for a state government like that, and leave you to sort out of if the request was legit or not. There's no place to hide. So Chase isn't actually the bad guy here.
- MA isn't really the bad guy either. The states are strapped for cash, and they're turning over every stone for revenue. What caught my CPA was a wrinkle in the tax law about where to file that for decades many CPAs ignored because the states didn't have the ability to find and go after such things. (MA was claiming that I owed "Massachusetts-sourced income" because Ars Technica LLC was technically headquartered in Malden.) But in today's world of desperate state governments and networked databases, no CPA can afford to be lazy about anything. To their credit, MA let me re-file and did not penalize. I had to pay state taxes twice for that year, though, because IL's books were closed for 2007 and they refused to even consider giving me back the money I erroneously paid them.
- This stuff drags out. While our assets were unfrozen pretty quickly, it was the first week of this month that I finally got a letter from MA telling me that the tax lien was officially lifted and that I'm in the clear.
- There is no statute of limitations on taxes. If they find something from literally 20 years ago, they can load it up with penalties and interest and absolutely crush you. So see the point above about making sure your CPA has a platinum-plated insurance policy.
"Again, I hadn't lived there or worked there since 2003, but I did own part of a business that was headquartered in MA, and the state was using this fact to harass me for income tax money."
So is the MA tax bill based on the profits of that business, or is the state just using it to say "you should pay all your income tax here"? Regardless, his beef should be with MA rather than the bank. I'd hardly fault Chase for complying with a court order - if crossing a state line made you judgement proof, why wouldn't everyone just run up debts, move one state over, and start fresh?
Edit: According to [0] they don't need to. They just send you a notice and if you don't respond in time they take what they want. It's not clear what constitutes responding or how to get the case into a court and out of an administrative process. I don't know about the out-of-state bank thing.
[0] http://www.mass.gov/dor/businesses/help-and-resources/legal-...
Sounds to me like his beef could be with the Chicago CPA. CPAs are not created equal, and even the big 4 accounting firms make serious mistakes when things get complicated - has happened to me. Usually, when that happens, the CPA is responsible for fixing the problem (paying late fees, filings, etc.), but you're still liable for the underlying tax burden that they may have missed.
In any case, would be nice to know what the resolution was!
And your scenario doesn't fit here because the 'debt' is from after moving.
Can you explain?
More to the point, the update makes it clear he doesn't really have a beef with MA: he did owe the taxes.
It took a few calls between us, Chase and the state agency, and a simple form to get the levy order rescinded before Chase fulfilled it (30 days after their receipt, for most such orders). Our funds were released within minutes of calling them to confirm that the state sent them a fax rescinding the levy order.
I've heard numerous horror stories about dealing with Chase on matters like this. I didn't find those stories to be true, in our case. I suspect the author either handled it (one would hope), or closed his tax account and chalked it up to lessons learned (a regrettable, but understandable decision to avoid further anguish and just "be done with it").
[1] https://becu.org
Although, I'm surprised they don't have an alternate name, most of the CA's I've worked with recently automatically add the naked domain as an alternate name when you order a cert with www
Deleted comment
In order to safely run an internetbank, there are a thousand of small things that all must be done right. If they can't even set up (and test, and verify, and maintain) https, what makes you think that they can handle 100% of the much more complicated computing security issues without missing something?
Except you example is false. I see no reason a quadriplegic couldn't serve as an ambassador.
> Every financial institution in the world is going to roll over for a state government like that, and leave you to sort out of if the request was legit or not. There’s no place to hide. So Chase isn’t actually the bad guy here.
I don't see the logic here. Everyone does it, so it must not be bad? I don't agree.
Recently I've noticed a lot of very small bills originating from adjustments on years-old returns. These are things that probably should be disputed, but they are coming in at $100-$200, which is far less that I'd pay someone to research for even an hour.
Here's my question: if the revenue department is going to make rounding-error level adjustments, why don't they just send me an advance tax bill, with all of the calculations that I can verify, and I'll just pay it?
Original text is published here: http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2013/02/chase-just-handed-ove...
I think you'll find it very difficult to achieve that with a bank you want to trust your money to; anti-money laundering treaties have cranked up the requirements on banks to verify the identity of new customers.
Apparently I was accountable for my ex-wife's tax bill (for a year in which we were not married) well after our divorce...in a state I never worked in.
They just took it. I happened to have a little in savings, and had just gotten my paycheck the day they took everything...so they got a decent amount (relative to me at least).
Also, once they decide to take your money it's nearly impossible to get it back.
I wonder what else is going on?
(Never mind that if word gets out you will get robbed.)
That, and armed guards are not cheap.
For example, the closing price exactly one year ago today was $880. Yesterday it was $248. So if you had $20,000 in savings and put them into Bitcoin, you'd have $5,636 now. What a wonderful savings account a 75% loss...
I swear the only reason people keep suggesting Bitcoin as an "investment" is because it is a pyramid scheme and they themselves are already deeply in the red, and see bringing in others as their only saviour.
Can anyone confirm this please?
Deleted comment