Scientists have shown that young blood rejuvenates old tissues
nature.com
nature.com
Many, many times I have considered:
"what would happen if I banked my own blood and transfused it back to myself 40 years later"
And of course, my next thought was "of course that has been thought of, and tried, and the reason we don't all know about it is because it must not be helpful."
But you're telling me that, in fact, nobody thought to try this ? It is 2014/2015 when someone got around to trying this out ?
Whatever controlled freezing method they propose for cryogenics ... although they also propose draining all the blood out first, so ... perhaps that's not relevant ?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4215333/
There is a human trial for transfusion of young blood to Alzheimer's patients but this is probably not going to tell us much, because it is so specific, and because the mouse transfusions didn't work.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22329831.400-young-blo...
Also i think you'd have a hard time to get money for any "anti aging" research up until recently.
July 11, 1991, episode "Blood Feud", the last episode of season 2. The scene is around the 7 minute mark. The implication is that the blood transfusion has made him feel young again.
There's actually a few references like this throughout the seasons of the simpsons.
It's honestly weird to me this wasn't tried in the early days of performing blood transfusions. I mean honestly the study wouldn't even be ethically questionable. You find patients that need routine blood transfusions and track their health over a period of time, you then administer blood transfusions from sources where you can control for the age of the blood donor.
I wouldn't be surprised if it was never even thought of because people seem all too willing to think of the body as "just a machine".
Given that we literally urinate out neurotransmitters, and that young people tend to be happier (it's actually called the happiness U-bend, in that 18-21 year olds are as happy as 70 year olds, and 50 years old is the lowest point in peoples reported happiness) so we could just be shooting people full of--quite literally--happiness. Given that severe depression can lead to myocardial infraction, I don't doubt general depression also has long term health effects. Also I don't think antidepressants would benefit, just because they generally make people "not feel" rather than "happy".
It's weird to me it wasn't tried the day after the first successful blood transfusion. A child would think of it.
That's what's so stupefying...
I do not remember where I read this any more 10+ years ago now.
Here is a small snippet I found with a few minutes of search that seems to be reference to the same behavior I remember reading about: https://books.google.com/books?id=bdIBlQXSKi8C&pg=PA78&dq=hi...
[1] : How to live forever: lessons of history http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1119261/
In the early days blood was in short supply and safety wasn't guaranteed. So logically, it was only used in patients that really needed it. Transfusions are safer today (there may be viruses we don't know about...) but blood is still in short supply and there are still rare but life threatening transfusion reactions.
Sure you are "stupefied" if you don't read the article:
Clive McCay, a biochemist and gerontologist at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, was the first to apply parabiosis to the study of ageing. In 1956 ...
http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/11/the-shelf-life-of-d...
https://postsecretdotcom.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/blood.j...
Here's the HN thread on that topic: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7695621
With a variant: the babies don't just vanish, they disappear for a while, and then come back. But alas, inexplicably, once they're back they begin to age very fast.
Maybe they don't disappear at all, they just start to age and that's how the inquiry starts. People notice the disease and think it's some kind of virus; but a young journalist trying to connect the dots notices all affected babies stayed at the same clinic at some point.
He goes there to see for himself and is greeted by a brilliant doctor who's wise beyond his years...
They have already identified one candidate--GDF11--and there will likely be others. So it may be a matter of injecting yourself with a mix of appropriate synthetics every day or two.
If I'm reading the article right, it was neither, but actually just the plasma:
> Plasma alone had the same effects. “We didn't have to exchange the whole blood”
Did they remove the growth hormones from the plasma? It doesn't say...
Excerpt:
“I thought, 'Hey wait, they're sharing blood,'” says Michael. “'This could answer that question we've been asking for years.'” At the end of the presentation, he ran up to Irina and Rando. He had not even finished his pitch before Rando said: “Let's do it.”
It was when I read up on how the body reacts to high altitude that I had my aha! moment that the blood was the common denominator between the gut and lung issues in people with CF. When you go up in altitude, you pee more. Well before you see altitude sickness, the body starts dumping wastes via the kidneys that it can't breathe out due to thin air.
Surprisingly readable after you get few paragraphs in and start picking up on the common mistranslated words (Some other title for Mao is being translated as "hair").
(I still consider it a mistranslation, as it's a name. I wouldn't expect John Smith to translate to another language with "Smith" being replaced bu the equivalent in the other language either).
Aging billionaire keeps a dozen healthy athletic vegetarian teenagers on hand for weekly blood transfusions.
No joke. It's happening right now.
So is this a bad thing?