This has little to do with the linked article and has been gone over repeatedly. Stack Exchange points out some of the problems securing a blockchain with 'useful work':
http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/20879/why-cant-we...
http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/20879/why-cant-we...
And just because something has been discussed more often, doesn't mean it should not be mentioned at all?
What it comes down to is that I don't think every story about bitcoin needs to have a bunch of facile criticism of bitcoin attached to it. Criticism specific to the story is great, as is well thought out, deeper criticism.