You're right, sunk costs are sunk costs. I guess I am try to also figure out if I want a "co-founder" or just another early hire.
You're right, sunk costs are sunk costs. I guess I am try to also figure out if I want a "co-founder" or just another early hire.
If you're negotiating terms, then it's a finite pie model and you're in the hiring business. That's a distraction from the core business mission - it's a means to an end -- [but an often necessary one]. Founding a company is about grabbing a slice of an infinite pie, it's outward focused. That means bouncing ideas off each other.
I'd be wary of anyone who is looking for the title. That's resume building, not business building. I'd be wary of anyone who is negotiating for a founder role. Founding is about doing not getting.
On the other hand, I'd be wary of anyone who wanted to be a founder without equal equity. Anything else creates friction on the relationship between founders. 50/50 equity is simply a way of testing whether it's a cofounder relationship or not.
I'm not saying you should give away half your company. But I'm not saying it isn't the right business decision either. It's a hard problem because the decision is about whether or not to take a leap of faith.
As a final thought, 10% or 50% if the person you are considering is not the right person, the business is going to suffer. Be equally selective in either case. Pick people you want to be in business with.
But if you aim at a good, healthy, profitable small company; I would just hire someone. Even if it is another more junior person.