This is a shame. They are radically better weather experiences than any you've seen before. Go check them out now.
This is a shame. They are radically better weather experiences than any you've seen before. Go check them out now.
I don't find them an improvement for medium-term or longer-term forecasting, and I continue to use other sources for these cases.
Good luck Dark Sky, keep improving :)
Forecasting sun when it rains generates complaints; the other way around, not so much.
Personally, I prefer it when they give percentages (which I assume are still pessimistic). The Met Office appears to forecast "rain" on a "30%" chance of precipitation.
YMMV and different strokes and all that.
No problem with that; nice interface. This site compares various "weather providers" and compares how they did: http://forecastadvisor.com/
"Past Performance is Not Necessarily Indicative of Future Results"
Longer-term forecasts and temperatures are incidental.
My user style https://userstyles.org/styles/104812/forecast-io-hide-map hides the map, which looks cool but is totally useless. That brings the detailed daily forecasts above the fold.
My user script https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/4699-forecast-io-auto-show... expands the detailed forecast for today when you visit the website, without you having to click it. I use the detailed forecast often, to check if the weather would be significantly different if I delayed my outing.
1. It defaults to my ISP's location 400 miles away in London, which is understandable but doesn't give me an obvious way to correct it. Can't select my city shown on the map or enter coordinates.
2. Despite guessing that I am in the UK it defaults its temperatures to Fahrenheit, which is utterly alien to Europeans.
10 mins later: still stuck on London.
Disclaimer: I visited forecast.io on my phone for the first time in years to check this. I may have missed subtleties of it not working.
I'm sold. Downloading now.