The Glider: An Appropriate Hacker Emblem (2014)
catb.org
catb.org
In all fairness I don't think a 'hacker community' as such exists any more - if there ever was one.
Though even for that community(and people now who really like the game of life) I don't think it is a great logo. Circles are not a very pretty or pleasant way of representing the game of life and it makes me think of a board game when I look at it.
For one thing, very few people I know of in the hacker community are as racist as ESR. He's out there with Terry Davis when it comes to being racist and mentally ill, but he can't hold a candle to Terry Davis's hacking ability.
"My favorite part of the "many eyes" argument is how few bugs were found by the two eyes of Eric (the originator of the statement). All the many eyes are apparently attached to a lot of hands that type lots of words about many eyes, and never actually audit code." -Theo De Raadt
The little experience Raymond DOES have auditing code has been a total fiasco and embarrassing failure, since his understanding of the code was incompetent and deeply tainted by his preconceived political ideology and conspiracy theories about global warming, which was his only motivation for auditing the code in the first place. His sole quest was to discredit the scientists who warned about global warming. The code he found and highlighted was actually COMMENTED OUT, and he never addressed the fact that the scientists were vindicated.
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Eric_S._Raymond
>During the Climategate fiasco, Raymond's ability to read other peoples' source code (or at least his honesty about it) was called into question when he was caught quote-mining analysis software written by the CRU researchers, presenting a commented-out section of source code used for analyzing counterfactuals as evidence of deliberate data manipulation. When confronted with the fact that scientists as a general rule are scrupulously honest, Raymond claimed it was a case of an "error cascade," a concept that makes sense in computer science and other places where all data goes through a single potential failure point, but in areas where outside data and multiple lines of evidence are used for verification, doesn't entirely make sense. (He was curiously silent when all the researchers involved were exonerated of scientific misconduct.)
He's the ORIGINAL hacker's hacker, who figured all of that out on paper, without the use of computers. And his Universal Constructor [3] is much more beautiful and interesting that a simple Life glider, in my opinion. Now that would make an impressive tattoo!
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_Neumann_cellular_automaton
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_Neumann_universal_construct...
[3] http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c4/Nobili_Pe...
(By the way, it's Alan Turing, not Turning -- a common and understandable mistake!)
(Also by the way, children and nice people read Hacker News, so please do not link to ESR's reprehensible web site, promote his racist ideology, or buy into his bullshit that he is a hacker or speaks for hackers.)
I'd suggest (λx.t), but that's not very anarchic, I guess.
High emphasis on collaboration, egalitarian mindset and a "respect stems from knowledge" attitude come to my mind.
But still most of the hackers I know don't want to be associated to anarchy, even though they act like anarchists. I think the reason is that their acting like anarchists simply is appropropiate for what they are trying to achieve and not a political act or message by itself.
Anyway, in the spirit of totally ignoring Raymond's pedantic and arbitrary missives, we (a hackerspace, somewhere) have produced our own variation, which is still part of the "game of life" glider sequence, but looks much better, looks sort of like an 'h' for hacker, or someone sitting typing, or a group of people (of different shades!) listening to a presenter, etc, etc, etc: http://i.imgur.com/ba7o9i0.png
Edit: Here's an archived copy from 2003: https://web.archive.org/web/20031202225527/http://www.catb.o...
But on the flip side, a still life isn't getting much done.