No. I was trying to approach this in a more, let's say, egalitarian put-myself-in-others-position way, considering why we (the western world) react more strongly to this horrific event and ignore others.
But I find it really tough to write about it and usually refrain so (long talks are better because one can moderate the speech and clear misunderstandings right away).
Your answer that accuses/asks me if I'm blaming the victim showcases this.
I very clearly wrote
Orthogonal to that
to showcase that I was pointing facts and that they didn't justify violence against them in any way and that everyone should have the right to speak without fear of violence (in all subjects, not just religious satires, which is why I posed the Glenn Greenwald article I felt relevant, did you read it?).
They can be racist (not saying they are since, as I said, it's a heavily politicized word that loses meaning easily) and that doesn't make them acceptable targets. The same goes for Neo Nazis, KKK members, people who say we Iran should be bombed, people who say USA should be bombed (funnily enough, these people might get prosecuted and jailed, see article), etc.
I might have written more than it's prudent and might have been all over the place. I'm sorry, it's late.
If something feels off, give me the benefit of the doubt and ask for clarification.