https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/103b171d8fc282ef435f...
Apparently this is done to work around potential length limitations in C string literals.
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/103b171d8fc282ef435f...
Apparently this is done to work around potential length limitations in C string literals.
It would seem odd if they actually change the build process in a security patch, right? The instructions on how to build OpenSSL on Windows has not been changed in 2 years.
No release of OpenSSL has ever been "the previous release plus the minimal patches for a security fix". This isn't a security patch. It's a new release that happens to include some security patches.
But thanks for the info. That seems like a pretty bad practice when it comes to a lib such as OpenSSL. Having to do changes to the build process to integrate an urgent security fix seems less than optimal.