Can someone explain what this is suppose to mean? I know there were attacks in Paris.
They were notorious for mocking all religions and have posted content offensive to all.
Right now it is thought that this was the work on islamist terrorists (I have not seen reliable info though, and crazy is cross religion)
Now to make matters worse the right is on the rise in Europe and the interfaith tensions are high due to complex reasons (being in economic depression for a decade helps little).
In a sense this was attack against the core values of what lots of Europe believes. And there are a lot of people for which anti muslim sentiment is a godsend ...
So what? A person's race doesn't determine the ideas, religious or otherwise, that they hold. Two famous examples: Ayaan Hirsi Ali left Islam, and Cat Stevens joined it.
A person's ideas, on the other hand, make all the difference in the world. Who can deny that these terrorists were not motivated and guided by a distinct ideology: fundamentalist Islam?
You'be be surprised. The race (or, to be precise, the ethnicity) very much determines the ideas, religious or otherwise that a person holds. Statistically very much. There's a reason a person born in Italy is far far far more likely to be Catholic and not Budhist, etc.
>Two famous examples: Ayaan Hirsi Ali left Islam, and Cat Stevens joined it.
That you can point to a few specific invdividuals as examples for that, doesn't it tell you all you need to know? That these people are famous exactly as outliers?
Most people stick with the prevailing religion in their country etc.
Let me try restating my point: there is no heritable trait that makes you a muslim, a buddhist or a freethinker.
What people choose to believe is ultimately on them. Uncritically accepting what your parents, friends and countrymen have to say is still a choice.
I don't know what the site is about.
Edit: Alright, the domain is the actual domain of Charlie Hebdo. This isn't some kind of political message by a third party but most likely a message by the people of Charlie Hebdo. I don't know any more.
Your EQ is low, isn't it?
But hey, jumping straight to a personal attack instead of an explanation says volumes about your EQ.
after you "corrected" a perfectly good translation?