(Edit: Tried to correct my bad English, sorry!)
(Edit: Tried to correct my bad English, sorry!)
Ford was incredibly nosy into workers' lives. If you wanted the infamous "five dollars a day," you had to let management make sure you were living decently at home, including the wife staying at home if she had a husband.
But since this time, the shareholder value has taken over the government.
I'm not quite sure, but I think this is saying that Ford got taken over by the government following bankruptcy. But Ford (unlike GM and Chrysler) did not go bankrupt.
To reword:
> But since this time, the shareholder value has taken over the government.
But since that time, Ford management only cares about maximizing shareholder value.
Not sure about Ford, but it's the same thing with Tomas Bata, famous Czech shoemaking enterpreneur and contemporary of Ford. He is also still lauded as a progressive by some, and he was for his era (he built homes for his workers, paid them well, etc.); however, judging from the today's moral standards, we would consider him very elitist and also nosy. For instance, he put part of employee's savings into his own bank.
This is something I'd happily put up with if I could find this mythical job that pays well enough to support a family on a single income.