Look who's interested in data all of a sudden.
Also, please abstain from flamewars on this site, especially religious flamewars.
(Also, it's nice if what they ask for can be answered with unequivocal objective data, which I'm sure you'll agree isn't the case with cscurmudgeon's request.)
There is a ton of data out there.
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=christianity+and+science...
As I said elsewhere in this thread, the only quality argument seems to be Gödel's proof of God's existence which has been machine verified by Zalta's group at Stanford.
But on the other side, all I see are ad hominems and complete ignorance of arguments like Gödel's while attacking the easy targets like the 2000-year creationists and anti-vaccine groups.
Whatever :)