[1] my comment when this "source" was posted to HN (before it was flagged for removal): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8789341
Yes, I know that Chuck Johnson (http://gawker.com/what-is-chuck-johnson-and-why-the-web-s-wo...) is unreliable and worse. But in this case, I thought the data sound enough to republish.
After reading that article.. why would he believe anything from this guy?
The point I meant to get at was that the timecode analysis which was featured is not just claimed by Charles Johnson, but rather is in the torrents released by GOP.
I don't have any problem with Schneier referencing this article.