Hacker News Reader

Comment by dragontamer | Hacker News Reader

Old tech designed to protect the President, very likely.

    A 2013 test confirmed the ability to track short-range ballistic missiles in their boost phase.

If a Nuke is to hit Washington DC, we'll want to make sure that the President is warned in time and can enter his nuclear bunker.

That said, "Captain America 2: The Winter Soldier" just came out, so people are probably thinking this is some sort of auto-kill sky cannon mounted on Helicarriers for the purpose of suppressing the US Population.

View on HN

What kind of a short-range nuke is going to hit Washington, DC? If it was installed in Seoul, South Korea then maybe, but not DC. There is already a large system in place to detect long-range ICBMs.

The kind fired from a submarine.

This looks roughly down from about 10k feet. For a midcourse or terminal ballistic missile, you want to be looking up, like the cobra dane radars or THAAD or patriot batteries. To find the launch, we rely on infrared satellite sensors like cobra brass, and use radar to track. But again, this would be inappropriate, and other radars would be used.

Who said it was ballistic? A submarine launched, nuclear armed cruise missile could be potent and worth defending against.

You're right. That's exactly the sort of weapon this was designed to detect.

Or shipped to a precise location in a container

A missile in communist Cuba, potentially.

The presence of anti-short range ICBMs would discourage Cuba as a base for Communists.

Yeah, the Berlin Wall fell a long time ago. But bureaucracy takes time.

>we'll want to make sure that the President is warned in time

WHY? How about warning whole population?

This always amazed me about US. President is not a god, he is just a function, there is a hierarchy of replacements. Why do you keep making one man above all citizens?

Does President Biden sound pleasant to you? How about President Boehner?

With that aside, a presidential death, homicide or otherwise, would be extremely jarring to the US population. Ask anyone who was alive when JFK got shot. And plus, if there ever is a major national crisis, we would need a strong leader with a strong mandate, not someone who just stepped in because the one before perished in said crisis.

Tempting a decapitation strike makes a bigger attack more likely.

Sure, the President as Commander and Chief can be replaced, but there could be a lot of confusion and time taken in the process, especially if many of the people in the hierarchy are also killed or otherwise indisposed.

US President has the nuclear launch codes.

It is unlikely that the US can defend from an ICBM, although if warned in time, the President can survive and then command a retaliatory strike.

US President is probably the weakest world leader by far. He's extremely constrained by Congress, and can't even negotiate a treaty without Congress breathing down his back.

But in a war situation... which a nuclear strike would definitely be... the first priority is to keep the Commander-in-Chief alive so that he can organize the counter-assault. That is his job after all.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com