Of course, without government intervention, they'd get nothing in bankruptcy.
I think losing 95% of your investment is enough to avoid huge moral hazard.
Society benefits because letting them fail sinks the economy much further.
Of course, without government intervention, they'd get nothing in bankruptcy.
I think losing 95% of your investment is enough to avoid huge moral hazard.
Society benefits because letting them fail sinks the economy much further.
There were multiple options for saving the US banking system, which was insolvent as a whole, since the supposedly not-insolvent banks would have gone down the tubes instantly had any of the larger insolvent banks been allowed to fail, due to their derivatives exposure and other counter-party risk.
For example, the banks could have been nationalized, and the charade of continuing large management bonuses could have been avoided.
What we got as a result of TARP and related bailout approaches is an unrepentant risky TBTF system that could explode again, and a compensation structure that fuels income inequality. Feh.