Meditation associated with preserved telomere length in breast cancer patients
fastcompany.com
fastcompany.com
this is a crummy article with a crummy headline about one single study which may or may not also be crummy
Start a new research. Work with 1-sigma significance (~2% error rate allowed). Then investigate the favorite brand of soup of the brothers of cured cancer patients. Make sure to research about 50 brands.
Huge news ! If you get your brother to eat soup brand 23 you have a significantly higher chance to survive cancer ! Huge article in every newspaper.
What happened here ? 2% error rate.
Set a timer for five minutes, sit down in a comfortable position (usually better than lying down, to keep yourself awake). Count your breaths until 10 and then count backwards down again. Repeat until the timer goes off, and bam! Meditation accomplished.
Don't worry if your mind drifts off, that's not a sign of failure. Just keep doing the task at hand (counting).
Use headphones if you need to block out sound. Slow music without lyrics or plain nature sounds usually work better.
Once you have that down, there are about a billion variations and ways to continue, but starting out doesn't have to be more complicated than outlined above.
Usually we wish to measure progress when undertaking any kind of endeavor, especially new ones, but measuring (or even defining) progress when it comes to meditation can be hard sometimes. It may require discipline on your part in order to overcome the perceived lack of feedback, but I assure you that you'll be very glad that you kept at it once you do start to notice what happens.
When I meditate, my goal is not actually to contemplate anything at all -- it is to clear my mind, whittle my senses down until the only thing I feel is consciousness. Ultimately, in a state of deep meditation, my goal is a fully blank state, in which I'm doing nothing except existing.
I find that this helps me tremendously in my mindfulness in normal life, but I don't attempt to be mindful _during_ meditation in the same way.
I think it's the privilege of the practitioner to formulate what meditation is to them, and the easier it is to establish a personal relationship to the practice unhindered by baggage (cultural, institutional, linguistic or otherwise), the better.
Can you expand a little on this? What does one starts noticing?
To give you an example (with the disclaimer above in mind), I've a friend who noticed that he doesn't need as much sleep when he meditates regularly. Stop meditating, need for sleep increases. That's not the case for me, I need about the same amount of sleep regardless of amount of meditation. If I'd been told that less sleep is achievable, I might have been discouraged by the fact that this particular perk is nowhere to be seen for me. But I happen to know not to use another person's map for my personal wilderness.
For me, focus, patience, attention, memory and a very even (almost immutable, lately) temper are some of the things that have come out of this.
Also, boredom goes away eventually. Single minded, laser focus attention is one thing that this practice cultivates, and the kind of focus that I'm talking about is mutually exclusive with boredom.
Also, the shit your brain will make up and entertain you with once the chatter dies down is absolutely fascinating all in itself.
I had thought that the absence of chatter only helps in calmness and lessening the anxiety. What kind of stuff/shit?
Quiescence is the whole point of the exercise. It requires a lot of discipline, which builds with practice, which is also the point of the exercise.
I started out doing it between "coming home from work" and "having dinner", but that didn't really work out. Some days, I came really late and my GF was already waiting with dinner ready, other days I would go to meetup, hang out with friends etc.
I'm now doing Yoga and Meditation every morning after waking up, and there's just much less that can get in the way.
My GF and me are right now building an iOS app for forming a daily habit of Meditation and/or Yoga, based on our own experience and reading the book "Hooked: How to build habit-forming products". If you (or anyone else!) would like to beta-test, shoot me a mail at chris [at] screenscott.com :-)
There really isn't a specific time meditation should be done, you just need to find what works for you.
Jon Kabat-Zinn doing a session at Google: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3nwwKbM_vJc
And, of course, Headspace: https://www.headspace.com/
Just sit back, relax, and enjoy one of those. And then all of them.
This was also pretty good, if you'd rather read a book: http://www.amazon.com/Search-Inside-Yourself-Unexpected-Achi...
Thanks for the book suggestion, I just bought this book.
It slowly lets you build up your practice, as well as choose a specific branch of focus as you progress. The ptich sounds gimmicky, but I never managed more than 5 consecutive days on my own. With Andy (the narrator) I'm at 30 days and counting
Exposure to radiation can change your DNA.
Heck, everything can change (read mutate) your DNA.
It's not like you suddenly evolve or jam a syringe of one minute retrovirus in your neck.
I note that the lead author of the study, Linda E. Carlson, is part of a group of cancer researchers promoting "integrative" approaches to cancer treatment. Another cancer researcher commenting on this approach thinks that "integrative" cancer therapy so far promises much more than it can actually deliver in improved patient outcomes.[2] The original headline of the Fast Company article submitted here, already changed by the Hacker News moderation team, is surely wrong, and it's not at all clear that this extraordinary claim will replicate if an independent group of researchers attempt to replicate the results. If I or any of my loved ones should happen to have a case of cancer (which is rather rare in my family), I will ask for advice on how to treat it from a doctor who practices science-based medicine.
[1] http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.29063/full
[2] http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/selling-integrative-onco...
Anyone looking on can read the paper for themselves for issues like sample size, the reported statistics, whether the expected finding was specified in advance, and so on. A recent submission to HN[1] cautions that press releases are not usually good guides to what a study has actually found.
[1] http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/communicating-health-sci...
That is not an issue with the study's quality. It is more of an issue with the study's motive (goal?).