Inside the fall of BlackBerry (2013)
theglobeandmail.com
theglobeandmail.com
> Mike Lazaridis was at home on his treadmill and watching television when he first saw the Apple iPhone in early 2007. There were a few things he didn't understand about the product. So, that summer, he pried one open to look inside and was shocked. It was like Apple had stuffed a Mac computer into a cellphone, he thought.
> To Mr. Lazaridis, a life-long tinkerer who had built an oscilloscope and computer while in high school, the iPhone was a device that broke all the rules. The operating system alone took up 700 megabytes of memory, and the device used two processors. The entire BlackBerry ran on one processor and used 32 MB. Unlike the BlackBerry, the iPhone had a fully Internet-capable browser. That meant it would strain the networks of wireless companies like AT&T Inc., something those carriers hadn't previously allowed. RIM by contrast used a rudimentary browser that limited data usage.
Its a very old story in IT. Some companies survive it, most don't.
Blackberries were, at their heart, 2-way messaging devices with other features grafted on. iPhones were computer that just happened to have a "Phone" app and an "SMS" app.
Send from my BlackBerry 10 Smartphone.
It's something I see over and over again. Blackberry had a huge loyal user base around its keyboard model, but they had to emulate the touch screens of Apple and Google since... well... that's what everyone else was doing.
Result: they lose their loyal customer base who liked that they were different, and they failed to gain any new customers since people who liked touch screens were already using their competitors.
From my experience the only thing that kept it's user-base as high as it was is the glacial pace of change in large company central ITs. Yes, there was a small holdout of physical keyboard users, and yes they will exist for some time - but blackberry was not going to continue functioning at that scale.