No, they are C++ pointers.

There are endless languages that have pointers, no need to talk anything about C.

>The answer in all cases is C.

Starting to sound like a broken record. No, the answer in all cases can also be found in C++, and understood in C++ terms alone. C++ is a SUPERSET of C, not just an arbitrary language + C.

I can provide a better example, but only tonight. At work now.

Some examples using Modula-2, a Mesa's successor.

How it allows for all the C pointer features, while adding a little bit more safety.

    MODULE examples;
    IMPORT Terminal, SYSTEM;

    (* procedure with reference parameter, no need for pointers *)
    PROCEDURE ChangeParam (VAR changeMe: CARDINAL);
    BEGIN
      changeMe := 25;
    END ChangeParam;

    (* 
       procedure with a slice, bounds given by HIGH(changeMe) and LOW(changeMe).
       also a string in this case
       no need for explicit pointers
    *)
    PROCEDURE DumpLetters (VAR letters: ARRAY OF CHAR);
    VAR
      i : CARDINAL;
      
    BEGIN
      FOR i := 0 TO HIGH(letters) DO
         WriteChar(letters[i]);
      WriteLn;
      (* Or just use *)
      WriteString (letters);
    END DumpLetters;


    VAR
      anInt : CARDINAL := 12 ;
      aPtr : POINTER TO CHAR;
      aBuffer : ARRAY [1..2] OF CHAR;
      anAddr : ADDRESS; (* think void* *)
      aPtr2 : POINTER TO CHAR;
      
    BEGIN
      WriteInt(anInt); (* writes 12 *)
      ChangeParam (anInt);
      WriteInt(anInt); (* writes 25 *)
      DumpLetters ('A simple string');
      NEW(aPtr); (* The compiler knows the size, no need for sizeof, but you can use ALLOCATE(aPTR, SIZE(CHAR)) if you want *)
      
      (* This is where it shares the same problems with C, due to manual memory control  *)
      DISPOSE(aPtr); 
      
      (* do pointer arithmetic if really required *)
      anAddr := SYSTEM.ADDADR (SYSTEM.ADR(aBuffer), SIZE(CHAR) * 1); 
      aPtr2 := SYSTEM.CAST(POINTER TO CHAR, anAddr); (* aPtr2 now points to aBuffer(2) *)
    END examples;

So the compiler will mark this module as unsafe since the meta-package SYSTEM is being used.

All Modula-2 successors, have GC support, as such the DISPOSE() would have to be written as SYSTEM.DISPOSE() and could only be applied to untraced pointers.