I wonder why CoreOS weren't in that meeting. They provide a ton of stuff that could be seen as a docker plugin (flannel being the most obvious imo)
I'm happy to spend as much time as needed with everyone to build a great ecosystem together. But if someone is not interested, they're not interested. I can't force them.
edit: and because they disagree with docker's direction. Potentially, CoreOS left themselves out of the conversation
I do believe CoreOS is likely one of the largest (the largets?) adopter of Docker, and their entire platform is built around Docker. Even with Rocket, they've stated they have no immediate plans to make CoreOS incompatible with Docker.
? not sure what shykes is implying here.
> 3-day old unfinished spec
Actually it's been in the git repo for 13 days, been public for 8 days, and has been getting developed since January 2014 (Docker is not even twice as old).
> no working implementation
Actually, Rocket is the implementation, ACI is the spec.
> a controversial background
How so? Because Docker disagrees with it so it's controversial?
> sponsored by a small venture-backed company
I think shykes is forgetting Docker just raised an excess of $40 million on a $400 million evaluation.
> with questionable motives
Again not sure what shykes implies here... Docker is a for-profit commercial vendor just the same.
The language and inaccuracies in shykes comment on github are shocking to say the least. Seems rather uni-directional "mud slinging", as shykes has previously put it[1]...