Why Some New York Drivers Prefer Lyft to Uber
nymag.com
nymag.com
The actual reason Lyft "won by a landslide" is that the method used to find those ten drivers was: hail current Lyft drivers then ask them if they've also worked with Uber. (The fact that somebody who has used both is currently working with Lyft means they like Lyft enough to stick with it; anyone who liked Uber a lot better would probably not still be using Lyft)
With Lyft I suppose it makes sense since they are, supposedly, sharing rides rather than a taxi (though it sure feels different from rideshares on Zimride or Craigslist). Even so, tipping is annoying and confusing.
- Lyft has social pressure to tip. Uber doesn't.
- Lyft doesn't aggressively penalize drivers who can't communicate with passengers. Uber does.
- Lyft has fewer riders / drivers, making the experience more personal. Uber is mechanical / efficient.
If I was a driver, I'd drive for Lyft. But as a rider, I'll take Uber.
Regardless, each driver I met was absolutely fantastic; very friendly and professional. The one complaint all of them had when I asked their opinion of Uber: The GPS is horrible.
One guy was going to make the switch to Lyft JUST because the Lyft maps use Google, and apparently it is simply just that bad.
I did witness this myself while on a work trip this past weekend - Uber GPS led them off the highway and then back onto the highway adding an extra 5 miles for no apparent reason.
I've never used Lyft before and I don't know what GPS Uber uses. Just an anecdote. I've had my personal GPS do stupid things like that too.
Being used to traditional taxis myself, I find the need for these full-time drivers to be so dependent on GPS a bit surprising.