Hacker News Reader

I find the .gitignore a good way to gauge the quality of a repo. This one does not exhibit quality.

What criteria do you use to assess "quality"? In any case, this .gitignore is almost entirely the standard GitHub setup for Visual Studio projects.

Well, that's a knock on /github then. The entries should be as minimal as possible, in number and in individual length.

What exactly do you think this .gitignore is lacking?

Quite the opposite of "lacking"--way too much.