PG is sharing observations based on seeing hundreds of founders succeed or fail.
PG is sharing observations based on seeing hundreds of founders succeed or fail.
You are wrong.
Disagreeable individuals place self-interest above getting along with others. They are generally unconcerned with others' well-being, and therefore are unlikely to extend themselves for other people. Sometimes their skepticism about others' motives causes them to be suspicious, unfriendly, and uncooperative. People very low on agreeableness have a tendency to be manipulative in their social relationships. They are more likely to compete than to cooperate.
Do you have any actual knowledge of the Big Five psychometric scales, or are you just saying that because you want it to be true?
Disagreeableness is a scientifically validated and incontrovertible synonym for meanness.
Agreeableness is a personality trait manifesting itself in individual behavioral characteristics that are perceived as kind, sympathetic, cooperative, warm and considerate. In contemporary personality psychology, agreeableness is one of the five major dimensions of personality structure, reflecting individual differences in cooperation and social harmony. People who score high on this dimension tend to believe that most people are honest, decent, and trustworthy.
Agreeableness is a synonym for niceness.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Five_personality_traits#Agr...
The agreeableness trait reflects individual differences in general concern for social harmony. Agreeable individuals value getting along with others.
This is absolutely not the opposite of meanness. If Wikipedia is incorrect, please edit it. Note that unlike a YC comment, a Wikipedia edit will require a real citation.
Or just go read a book, textbook, or journal article on the big 5 system.
Source: I'm a grad student in psychology. Specializing in empirically keyed personality psychometrics (i.e. psychology centered on data analytics. I also have a BS in CS. I'm basically a "data scientist" / statistician)