I did actually put quite a bit of thought into how I was going to put in the code samples. I elected to use BASIC like syntax because IMHO, this is close to as common denominator as possible and most universally understood (this is not an invite to start a flame war!)
I also elected to start by arrays at 1, rather than 0. The purest in my wanted to use zero, but to make it more universally understood, I elected to use one (because it also relates to the real world and card #1). I think more people will understand it this way.
The other thing I almost did not do (but changed my mind at the last minute), was to in-line the swap function and enumerate all three steps. I almost wrote it with Swap(i,s) function instead. Half of me thinks using a function is easier to understand, the other half likes the in-line for explaining it.
It's not as if the logic is very hard, there's one loop.
I'm curious what others think. Was it hard to understand? I'm always keen to learn more. Could I have explained it easier with the changes above?
He also made comments about using Basic. Seems you made the wrong choices...
Nice article.
Being pseudocode I found it odd to mix loop syntax. One loop has its conditions at the top and the other at the bottom. I guess that is just taste though.