You present a false dichotomy. I'm dubious that at any point going forward students, learners, and academics in third world countries will have less access to up-to-date information than they do now as a result of this ruling.
Even if we assume that publishers stop producing separate International editions, there is no reason to assume they will price them identically in all regions. More likely, they will price them in a way that they think will maximize their profits. If this price is judged by the international audience to be too high, the market will respond with increased piracy. Eventually, some other publishers will enter the market with a reincarnation of the "International edition" lured by the siren song of potential profit.
In the alternative (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_pleading), if the International editions truly contain less content than the standard edition (15-20% of the content), and hence less value, perhaps the international price is simply fair value here in the US as well? And if so, why should sale at this price (plus profit for the importer) be prohibited? I find it more likely that the captive nature of the US audience (required textbook of a specified edition) allows the US edition to be priced at a premium beyond that which the information content itself would justify.