It would make sense but it wouldn't be true. And the linked articles of "the bad parts" are pretty Angular specific.
Its good to have feedback from the community, but I wish some of these posts would get down to the specifics, we would all benefit much more. Something like: "I tried to this (details) in Angular and it was difficult, tried to do it again with this other framework and it was much easier".
http://www.fse.guru/angular-bad-parts-part-1
http://www.fse.guru/angular-bad-parts-part-2
http://www.fse.guru/angular-bad-parts-part-3
http://www.fse.guru/angular-bad-parts-part-4
>'Dependency injection lacks some functionality you will need sometime.'
But fails to reveal which functionality he has in mind.
He later claims that 'inheritance is an antipattern' and posts a link to google search results as 'proof'.
Not worth reading, in my opinion.
Having to click a link to reach the information you need, isn't a big deal IMHO. It's the content that should be discussed. Personally, I don't see anything wrong with posting links to prior (or other) blog posts.